How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible

Posted On Sep 9, 2020 By admin With Comments Off

The Doctors for Disaster Preparedness1 lecture above, sacrificed August 16, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada, facets Dr. Lee Merritt, an orthopedic spinal surgeon with a medical rehearse in Logan, Iowa. 2

In her lecture, she discusses how geopolitical dominance is likely to be swayed in the omission of an identifiable military or testified war. She talks about the cognitive dissonance we’re currently facing, when what we’re told no longer equals with known facts or logical thinking.

And she reviews how medical technocrats — the so-called medical experts and political leaders who have turned the world upside-down in response to COVID-1 9 — have been 100% wrong about everything they’ve been telling us.

They’ve been wrong about the initial risk assessment, testing, preventive measures, mask wearing and social distancing. They’ve conflated “cases” or positive research with the actual illness. They’re likewise guilty of corrects of excision — not telling us what medical doctors and scientists know to be helpful.

“I can give you the benefit of the doubt when you’re wrong about one or two things, but when you’re wrong 100% of the time, generally, “thats really not” by coincidence, ” Merritt says. “They should have come up with something that was in our best interest if they truly cared about us.”

The Rise of Technocracy

Merritt credits her understanding of technocracy to reading Patrick Wood’s book, “Technocracy Rising: The Wooden horse of Global Transformation.” Wood is also the journalist in chief of Technocracy News& Trends. I recently interviewed Wood. His interrogation is featured in “The Pressing Dangers of Technocracy.”

As illustrated by Wood and Merritt, technocracy is an fiscal dogma built around autocrat principle by unelected leaders. It got its begins in the 1930 s during the height of the Great Depression, when scientists and architects got together to solve the nation’s financial difficulties. At the time, it looked like capitalism and free enterprise were going to die, so they decided to invent a brand-new economic system from scratch.

They announced such systems “technocracy.” The command comes from the word “techn, ” which signifies “skill, ” and the idol “Kratos, ” which is the divine personification of ability. As explained by Merritt, a technocrat somebody who rehearsals power over you on the basis of the results of their knowledge.

Based on deaths per capita, the demise rate for COVID-1 9 is 0.009%. That implies the average person’s chance of living this cancer is 99.991%.

As an economic system, technocracy is resource-based. Very than basing the economic system on pricing mechanisms such as supply and involve, the technocratic plan is instead based on energy resources. In a nutshell, under this system, corporations would be told what aids they’re allowed to use, when, and for what, and consumers would be told what the hell is buy.

Former President Obama’s implemented to fiscal penalties for those working unwilling or unable to purchase health insurance could be viewed as an example of this system, in which you do not have the freedom to choose whether you want to buy a service or not. Your only choices are to purchase that which is mandated, or pay a fine.

The technocratic organization also involves, definitely compels, social engineering, which relies on massive all the data and the use of artificial intelligence. Technocrats have quietly and relentlessly propagandized the agenda items forward ever since those early days in the’ 30 s, and signs of its implementation has become more visible.

Evidence of technocratic regulate has likewise become evident during the pandemic. The ban and manipulation of medical information are part and parcel of the social engineering part of this organisation.

The Lies We’ve Been Told About COVID-1 9 Death Risk

In her lecture, Merritt reviews various lies we’ve been told by the technocratic society, starting with the actual risk of death. Located on deaths per capita, the extinction frequency for COVID-1 9 is 0.009%( 709,000 parties have died from or with COVID-1 9 around the world, and the global population is 7.8 billion ). That then wants the average person’s chance of subsisting this sicknes is 99.991%.

The area with the highest death rate, New York, has a death per capita rate of 0.17%, yet Dr. Anthony Fauci publicly lauded New York for its excellent COVID response. This is just one example that give cause cognitive dissonance, as praising the sphere with the highest death rate( even though they are low overall) as having one of the best responses simply isn’t logical.

Ironically, five members of the six countries with the lowest death rates( straying between 0.00003% and 0.006%) did very little in terms of pandemic response; they didn’t closed down or order parties to stay home.

Yet, we’re told these measures are absolutely necessary, and must continue, perhaps indefinitely. This too starts big cognitive dissonance, as it starts against all reasoning. If an activity doesn’t to be translated into an discernible interest, it simply doesn’t make sense to continue, let alone claim that was and is necessary.

Purposeful Conflation of’ Positive Tests’ With’ Cases’

Furthermore, instead of comforting everyone and opening the world back up when the demise toll started falling, the narrative unexpectedly shifted focus to “cases, ” propose people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 — regardless of whether they had manifestations. More cognitive dissonance, as the primary measure of disease threat is its lethality.

As pointed out by Merritt, since ancient times, a “case, ” medically speaking, has referred to a diseased person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness.

Now all of a rapid, this well-established medical call, “case, ” has been completely and arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of viral RNA. “That is not epidemiology. That’s fraud, ” Merritt says.

What’s more, most of the tests utilized have no marks, making we don’t know what the rate of fictitiou positives and untrue negatives are. And, many areas are tacking on additional “cases” when someone experiments positive and communicates that they’ve been around other parties. Again, “that’s fraud, ” Merritt says.

Evidence that the technocratic publicity is working can be seen in a recent poll by Harvard, Oxford and Universita Boconi, which discovered Millennials conceive 2% of their generation will die from COVID-1 9. “That’s 10,000 times more than the reality, ” Merritt says. “It’s only altogether out of proportion to reality.”

The Lies We’ve Been Told About Mask Wearing

Lie No. 2 is about the benefits of mask wearing. “It’s not scientifically sound, so why are we doing it? ” Merritt questions. It’s “just a representation of submission.” As noted in her slide demonstrate, “The strongest debate for disguise wearing is it sounds great. The strongest justification against cover-up wearing is it doesn’t work at all.”

Alongside that excerpt is a photo of a man’s face covered in dust particles after find sheetrock wearing a Class II medical earloop facemask, with the caption, “Each particle of sheetrock junk is 10 microns. Coronavirus is 0.125 microns. Any questions? ”

The coronavirus is nearly 100 hours smaller than sheetrock junk. In other messages, surgical cover-ups cannot and do not block the coronavirus( or any other virus for that are important ). Surgical mask cartons are even engraved with the warns that the cover-up “will not provide any protection against COVID-1 9 or other viruses, ” and “does not reduce the gamble of contracting any disease or infection.”

Ditto for medical N95 respirator masks, as they only block particles larger than 0.3 microns. N95 concealments are used in hospital positions to protect against tuberculosis, as the TB virus is 3 microns. You must, however, wear the remedy length, it must be properly fitted to your face, and you must follow certain procedures when putting it on and removing it to prevent cross contamination.

OSHA respirators, used by construction workers and other manufactures, also screen down to 0.3 microns, but they are furnished with a one-way valve. So, it exclusively screens the breath coming in , not the air going to go. So, you’re in no way protecting others when wearing such a concealment.

The Quality of Data Is What Matters

Merritt too discusses a publication in PNAS, “Identifying Airborne Transmission as the Dominant Route for the Spread of COVID-1 9, ”3 in which the authors purport to support mask wearing by looking at New York City as a prototype. Harmonizing to Merritt, she has serious concerns about this study, as it doesn’t control for the No. 1 point that abbreviates infectivity, namely humidity.

The higher the humidity, the lower the infectivity rate. The paper also has “all these bizarre cites, ” Merritt says, “that have absolutely nothing to do with the precursors of anything you would look at to do this kind of research.”

What’s more, at least one of the authors rostered, Yuan Wang, has no medical background whatsoever. He’s in the discord of planetary and geological sciences at Cal Tech.

The graph showing that infectivity in New York City was reduced when concealment wearing was mandated also accords the natural downslope seen in Sweden( which has no such lockdown or disguise mandate) as the illnes led its course. In no way does it prove that mask wearing actually impedes illnes. “This is a awfully intelligent made-up fraud, I study, ” Merritt says.

She likewise re-examine other books in the medical literature presenting masks is not are protected by viral infections — including a May 2020 review by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention itself, which I wrote about in “WHO Admits: No Direct Evidence Masks Prevent Viral Infection.” In its consideration of the item, the CDC concluded that disguises should not are protected by influenza in non-health care aims.

Merritt too quotes studies presenting there’s no difference between surgical cover-ups and medical N95 cover-ups. For a better understanding of the science, she recommends learn Denis Rancourt’s newspaper, 4 “Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-1 9 Policy.” I’ve likewise interviewed Rancourt, who has a Ph.D. in physic, about his findings, which you can find in “Masks Likely Do Not Inhibit Viral Spread.”

Mask Mandates for Peons and the Social Distancing Lie

The suspicion that concealments are little more than suppression muzzles also gains forte by the fact that lawmakers are sparing themselves and certain types of workers from their cover-up mandatories.

Two patterns given in Merritt’s lecture is the D.C. mask commission, which spares lawmakers and government employees. In Wisconsin, the Governor has spared all legislators from the cover-up say. If disguises genuinely worked, wouldn’t these employees be prime candidates for wearing disguises everywhere to prevent them from getting complaint and dying?

The third lie Merritt examines is the 6-foot social distancing govern. Thirty-four minutes into the chide, you’ll find a fascinating video from a study5 produced March 26, 2020, in JAMA Insights, supporting the corpuscle emissions appearing when sneezing. In this study, they presented releases can contact 23 to 27 feet( 7 to 8 meters) — a far cry from the 6-foot length we’re told will hinder everyone safe.

The Biggest Lie: Lysosomotropic Worker Don’t Work

Lie No. 4, which Merritt believes is the biggest one of all, is that lysosomotropic operators( narcotics that acidify the lysosome) such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine don’t work. Fauci has repeatedly territory that these dopes either don’t work, that there’s insufficient evidence, or that the evidence is only anecdotal.

Yet the National Institutes of Health itself produced research6 in 2005 convey chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread, actually having both prophylactic and therapeutic benefits. As the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID ), which forms part of the NIH, since 1984, Fauci should be well aware of these results.

As for what the motivating might be for suppressing the use of hydroxychloroquine, despite all the evidence showing it parts quite well when exercised early in the trend of management, Merritt points to a 2006 study7 in the Virology Journal, titled “In Vitro Inhibition of Human Influenza A Virus Replication by Chloroquine.”

That study gave “overwhelming proof that chloroquine impeded influenza A, ” Merritt says. Now, if an inexpensive generic remedy can prevent influenza illnes, then what the hell is we need seasonal influenza vaccines for?

Another paper, 8 “Effects of Chloroquine on Viral Infections: An Old Drug Against Today’s Diseases? ” published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases in 2003, discussed the potential of chloroquine against a range of viral cankers.

So , is not simply might we have an inexpensive remedy that can fight the flu, it might be useful against many other infections as well. In short, were these doses to be recognised by their antiviral benefits, they could disrupt the drug industry to a significant degree. Is that why they’re quashed and denigrated?

Follow the Money

Merritt also assesses Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s clinical ordeal with hydroxychloroquine, which you can spoke more about in “How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created.” Of route, the media vilified Zelenko rather than applauding his remarkable success against COVID-1 9.

Even more egregiously, Merritt mentions, was the fact that a Baltimore federal prosecutor actually started an investigation into Zelenko based on his statement that hydroxychloroquine is FDA approved. “It is FDA approved, ” Merritt says. “You don’t going to be home once things are FDA approved to do reapproval for a new indication.”

Doctors have ever had the ability to prescribe dopes off-label for other conditions formerly they’ve been approved by the FDA, which is precisely what physicians have been doing with hydroxychloroquine. But now all of a sudden, that common( and perfectly legal) rehearsal is illustrated as contentious, unethical and/ or illegal.

There’s likewise the clinical experience of French microbiologist and infectious disease expert Didier Raoult, benefactor and director of the research hospital Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Mediterranee Infection, 9 who reported1 0,11 that a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin — administered immediately upon diagnosis — led to recovery and “virological cure” in 91.7% of patients.

Merritt also refreshes the fraudulent science that has been used to suppress hydroxychloroquine use, referring to these studies as “a new level of sham papers.” In one instance the generators pulled the data set out of thin air. They spawned it up.

Yet these fraudulent newspapers were published in The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine, two of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in all countries of the world. It’s usefulnes asking how that could happen. As noted by Merritt, what we’re told and what’s borne out by details simply don’t add up 😛 TAGEND

Hydroxychloroquine penalties $10 to $20 for a direction of care, is already FDA approved, has minimum feature outcomes and has been shown to cut the death rate by 50% when afforded early in the medication of COVID-1 9.12

Yet Fauci is propagandizing the use of remdesivir, 13 an intravenous medicine for late-stage severe COVID-1 9 infection that costs $3,600, has been shown to cause severe side impressions in 60% of patients, and doesn’t reduce the death rate. It merely shortens the recovery rate by an average rate of 31%, or four days.

Merritt reputes the above reasons we’re not espousing hydroxychloroquine is because it could raze the $69 billion inoculation industry. That alone is enough of a motivating to warrant a cover-up, she notes.

The drug could also eliminate one of the strongest leverages for geopolitical strength that the technocrats have, namely biological terrorism. If we know how to treat and protect ourselves against decorator viruses, their ability to keep us in line by saving us in dread vanishes.

Lies by Omission and Ultimate Motives

Last but not least, Merritt remembers lies of excision — actualities that would have saved lives had they been promoted. This includes data showing that higher vitamin D status increase both the seriousness of COVID-1 9 infection and the mortality. So, who benefits from the suppression of data and information that can save lives and the promotion of medical lies?

According to two reviewers, John Moynahan and Larry Doyle, Bill Gates negotiated a $100 billion contact find contract with Democratic Congressman Bobby L. Rush — who also introduced HR 6666, the COVID-1 9 TRACE Act — six months before the COVID-1 9 pandemic broken out, during an August 2019 converge in Rwanda, East Africa. 14

The U.S. government has also acquired 100 million quantities of a COVID-1 9 vaccine still under improvement by Pfizer and BioNTech. As noted by Merritt, we keep experiencing how treat corporations money “working groups” on sickness, and then when the disease breaks out, those same remedy business oblige billions in revenue.

But aside from profit, Merritt is convinced there’s another reason behind the irrational pandemic responses we’re attending. She notes how in a few short months, we’ve been dramatically changed from a commonwealth of freedom to a commonwealth of autocracy. And the method that was done was through the technocratic mechanisms of social engineering, which of course involves mental manipulation.

Psychological Manipulation Tools

Merritt revaluations psychiatry professor Albert Biderman’s work on mental manipulation and his “chart of pressure, ” all of which can be clearly related to the COVID-1 9 response 😛 TAGEND

Isolation skills — Quarantines, social distancing, isolation from loved ones and solitary confinement

Monopolization of knowledge — Monopolizing the 24/7 information repetition, censoring dissenting views and creating barren environments by closing forbids, gyms and restaurants

Degradation skills — Lecturing, reproaching beings( or even physically criticizing) those who refuse to wear masks or social distance, or generally choose flexibility over fear

Induced debility — Being forced to stay at home and not be able to rehearsal or socialize

Threats — Warning with the removal of your children, prolonged quarantine, closing of your business, penalizes for noncompliance with mask and social distancing patterns, forced vaccination and so on

Demonstrating omnipotence/ omniscience — Shutting down around the world, claiming scientific and medical authority

Enforcing inconsequential demands — Examples include family members being forced to stand 6 hoofs apart at the bank even though they arrived together in the same car, having to wear a mask when you walk into a restaurant, even though you can remove it as soon as you sit down, or having to wear a mask when treading alone on the beach

Occasional indulgence — Reopening some storages and restaurants but only at a certain capacity, for example. Part of the coercion contrive is that humorings are always taken away again, though, and they’re previously saying we may have to closed down all countries of the world again this fall

Merritt compress a lot of information into her hour-long presentation, so I hope that members can take the time to position it. Aside from what I’ve once summarized above, she also re-examine 😛 TAGEND

The affect of the World Health Organization and its largest funder, Bill Gates, and his numerous connections to the drug and vaccine industries, digital economy and digital tracking engineerings

The bizarre similarities between the Gates-funded Event 201 and current world events

The consistent defaults to create coronavirus vaccines in the past, as all experiments revealed the vaccines justification paradoxical immune improvement, which acquired the infection more destructive. You can learn more about this in “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Explains Well-Known Hazards of Coronvirus Vaccines”

Fauci’s conflicts of interest