Corporate Spies Revealed

Posted On Oct 1, 2019 By admin With Comments Off

HuffPost revealed situations of extreme periods Monsanto , now Bayer, has gone to in order to influence the media, including “shady tactics” and seeding a see in the courtroom during one of the Roundup cancer inquiries.

A woman called Sylvie Barak told other correspondents that she was a freelancer for the BBC, but it last-minute turned out that she didn’t. Instead, she appeared to have worked for FTI Consulting, a business advisory firm that Monsanto and Bayer had hired.

Barak invited the other journalists to meet one of her clients and have a “girls’ night out” of styles, during which she seemed to fish for reporters’ panoramas on Monsanto and spew industry-friendly banter.

A reporter who was present, but who wished to remain anonymous, told HuffPost, “[ Barak] would make suggestions about interesting parts of the testimony. And then go on and on about certain stages of testament to try and get it into storeys, and it was always bad for the plaintiffs.”1

FTI responded by saying Barak attended the trial to take notes, and Bayer disclaimed sanctioning FTI to work at the cancer trial, but several journalists involved said they were left feeling like someone else might be watching them.

“Monsanto has also previously utilized shadowy structures of consultants, PR houses, and breast radicals to spy on and affect reporters, ” HuffPost stated. “And all of it appears to be part of a blueprint at the company of using a variety of tactics to coerce, mislead and refute reporters and critics.”2

Monsanto Hired World’s Elite Spy Firm

Among Monsanto’s representatives is the British private investigate house Hakluyt, which is regarded as an elite spy firm. The relationship was revealed in documents made public during the Roundup cancer trial. Harmonizing to HuffPost: 3

“The Monsanto document4 offers a rare insight into Hakluyt’s work, its tricks and political reach.

In a swear deposition for the tribulation, former Monsanto attorney Todd Rands testified that Hakluyt workers intentionally obstructed their links to Monsanto as they gathered information from high-ranking government officials in 2018, including a Trump White House policy adviser and senior officials at the Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency.

‘We wanted to make sure that we could hear things about ourselves that beings might not say directly to us, ’ said Rands, who also notes in the deposition that he left Monsanto in January 2019 and was then consulting for FTI.”

Monsanto also has ties to PR firm Ketchum, which led to a pro-GMO campaign announced GMO Answers( with funding from Monsanto and other manufacture managers like DuPont and Dow AgroSciences, along with FleishmanHillard, a PR house that was reportedly involved in creating Monsanto hit lists.

Publicis, a French-based PR firm that devoted$ 6 million to NewsGuard, a self-appointed arbiter of what it influences is trustworthiness in online media, likewise facilitated compile the rolls, according to The Wall Street Journal. 5

Monsanto’s so-called “stakeholder mapping project”6 was first uncovered in France, but now it materializes Monsanto likely had various indices to track beings in countries throughout Europe. The schedules contained hundreds of specifies and other personal information about correspondents, politicians and scientists, including their opinions about pesticides and genetic engineering. 7

In May 2019, French lawyers said they had opened an investigation into Monsanto’s alleged watch rolls full of private knowledge were related to about 200 parties. Bayer said it has stopped communications and public affairs activity with FleishmanHillard. 8 As for their capacity, FleishmanHillard protected their work, saying it’s been “mischaracterized, ” and adding: 9

“Corporations, NGOs and other consumers rightfully expect our firm to help them understand diverse perspectives before they employ. To do so, we and every other professional communications bureau gathering relevant information from publicly available sources.

Those planning documents are fundamental to outreach struggles. They help our clients best engage in the dialogue relevant to their business and societal objectives.”

Monsanto’s’ Fusion Center’ Discredits Reports and Nonprofits

Carey Gillam, a veteran investigative journalist and author of “Whitewash — The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer and the Corruption of Science, ” has previously gone on record about how Monsanto tried to discredit her for writing critical cases about the company and its harmful products. Internal documents from Monsanto’s “fusion center” divulged a tactical response was an attempt to do just that by bringing in third-party actors. 10

“The records … demo Monsanto adopted a multi-pronged strategy to target Carey Gillam, a Reuters journalist who analyse the company’s weedkiller and its links to cancer, ” The Guardian wrote. 11

“Monsanto , now owned by the German pharmaceutical busines Bayer, too monitored a not-for-profit menu experiment company through its ‘intelligence fusion center, ‘ a call that the FBI and other law enforcement agencies use for activities focused on monitoring and terrorism.

The documents, principally from 2015 to 2017, were disclosed as part of an ongoing court battle on the health hazards of the company’s Roundup weedkiller.”

The American Council on Science and Health( ACSH ), a nonprofit organization that claims to be a “pro-science consumer advocacy organization” with the focus of publically corroborating “evidence-based science and medicine, ”1 2 is one of Monsanto’s third-party players.

In 2015, internal emails revealed that Monsanto contributed to ACSH, with impeccable timing, as IARC’s glyphosate( the active ingredient in Roundup) verdict was set to be released.

The emails were first disclosed as evidence during Dewayne Johnson’s Roundup lawsuit. The trial, the first listen to this, ended with Monsanto being ordered to pay $ 289 million in detriments to Johnson, although the accolade was later reduced to $78 million.

The evidence made another appearance during the third Roundup case, in which a married couple, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, claimed they both developed Non-Hodgkin lymphoma after regular expend of Roundup. The jury decided in the Pilliods’ favor, telling the chemical being to pay$ 2 billion to its scapegoats.

In the emails, Dr. Daniel Goldstein, the head of medical sciences and outreach at Monsanto, writes to collaborators about ACSH’s value to the company, stating there was “some money set aside for IARC” and Monsanto “should go ahead and make a contribution” pointing out that they had “dozens of pro-GMO and glyphosate postings” in the previous year. 13 The collaborators still weren’t persuasion, so Goldstein then wrote: 14

“While I would love to have more friends and more choices, we don’t have a lot of supporters and can’t afford to lose the few we have … You WILL NOT GET A BETTER Appraise FOR YOUR DOLLAR than ACSH: They are working with us to respond if needed to IARC … ”

It’s unclear just how much Monsanto paid for ACSH’s continued protections, but even a cursory glance at their site intimates it works within Monsanto’s favor.

In return, ACSH attacked IARC’s locates as “scientific fraud, ” going so far as to call the cancer agency a “fringe group, apparently more interested in scaring beings than linking actual state threats.”1 5 ACSH has articles attacking glyphosate’s safety in terms of cancer, for bees and even in your menu. 16 Bayer told HuffPost that they no longer afford fund to ACSH. 17

Monsanto Tries to Play Journalist for Hit Job

The anonymous reporter who spoke with HuffPost had another story aside from the FTI plant during the cancer trial. This time, a writer, Mary Mangan, working for the Monsanto-funded industry front group The Genetic Literacy Project, contacted her, hinting she dig up a gossip involving a researcher who certified against Monsanto, as well as speak to Jay Byrne. HuffPost reported: 18

“When the reporter read the documents Mangan forwarded, she found nothing worth reporting. Mangan, she felt, was’ playing’ her to do a affect profession. Out of the blue, Byrne then contacted her on social media to discuss how GMO criticism was part of a Russian influence campaign; when she Googled Byrne, she learned he is Monsanto’s former director of communications and now leads the PR firm v-Fluence.

His buyers have included Monsanto, CropLife, and the American Chemistry Council, and he is the co-author … of journal that disagrees against chemical refuge regulations. It was then she recognise’ that there’s a lot of creepy sh* t going on.’”

Like others, I was among those deemed to be a threat to Monsanto: My name even appeared on one of Byrne’s hit lists. The nonprofit U.S. Right to Know( USRTK) has also been targeted by Monsanto, which produced written reports on USRTK’s undertakings, along with a detailed plan for how to deal with USRTK’s Freedom of Information Act( FOIA) solicits. Common Dreams reported: 19

“In more than 30 pages of internal papers detailing its plan to counter USRTK, Monsanto acknowledged that the’ worst case scenario’ resulting from the FOIA request would be an’ notorious email[ representing] what would be the smoking gun of the industry( e.g. email registers professional/ fellowship covered under unflattering research or depicting GMOs are dangerous/ pernicious ). ’

‘The company acts like it has only one frightful mint to hide, ’ said Gary Ruskin, co-director of USRTK, in a statement.’ Whenever scientists, correspondents, and others raise questions about their business, they criticize. We are just the latest example. This has been going on for years.’”

Gillam, who is now the research director for USRTK, likewise told The Guardian that, following the release of her record, “Whitewash: The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer, and the Corruption of Science, ” she got “glowing reviews” from professional reviewers but her Amazon page filled with negative scrutinizes planted by industry.

“They were saying unpleasant things about me … It was very upsetting but I knew it was forgery and it was engineered by the industry. But I don’t know that other people known that, ” she told The Guardian, who are still: 20

“A Bayer spokesman, Christopher Loder, declined to comment on specific documents or the fusion midst, but said in a statement to the Guardian that the records demo’ that Monsanto’s acts were intended to ensure there was a carnival, accurate and science-based dialogue about the company and its products in response to significant misinformation, including steps to respond to the publication of a record written by an individual who is a frequent critic of pesticides and GMOs.’”

Help USRTK Unearth the Truth — Donate Today!

One of the key take-home sends from all this is that the unionized silencing of analysts exerting vile tricks is standard practice, and has been standard practice for a long time. In fact, these underhanded approaches was exactly what have allowed Monsanto, as well as many other dangerous firms operates on a similar playbook, to continue selling toxic produces for so long.

Using third-parties pretending to be independent to broadcast the corporate schedule is grossly misleading to the public. What Monsanto has been doing is social engineering — clearing you think a certain viewpoint overridings in the general population and among journalists, scientists and academia when in fact this “consensus” is a absolutely engineered artifice, bought and paid for by corporate interests.

USRTK has done an enormous position fetching these kinds of industry schemes into wide-ranging dawn. They’re a insignificant enterprise with precisely four employees and depend on donations to keep this work starting. So, satisfy, consider making a tax-deductible donation to USRTK today. Your help is urgently needed and your give will ensure USRTK can continue unearthing the truth, one document at a time.

>>>>> Click Here <<<<<