Americans Have No Clue What the True COVID Numbers Are

Posted On Sep 24, 2021 By admin With Comments Off

Knowledge gives you the power to realize informed decisions based on evidence. A bank will not lend money to an entrepreneur without a business plan. Fellowship that operate without a plan will fail.

You would not consent to fly in a plane with a pilot who didn’t have his permission. You wouldn’t purposely hire an attorney who didn’t pass the bar. You wouldn’t get into a taxi with a driver who couldn’t drive.

And hitherto, many have been preparing state decisions based on errors, misinformation and sometimes outright lies. A report1 released after 2020, six months into the pandemic, revealed that most Americans had significant fallacies of the health risks involved from COVID-1 9. Months last-minute, sign suggests not much has changed.

Firm Calls Results’ Nothing Short of Stunning’

Six months after the start of the pandemic, asset control organization Franklin Templeton Investments, in collaboration with Gallup, 2 released a report about Americans’ understanding of the COVID-1 9 illnes. The study focused on fundamental and undisputed facts of the risk for individuals and did not address any information that might be seen as contentious, such as treatment options and lockdown policies. In review reports, the firm wrote: 3

“Six months into this pandemic, Americans still dramatically misread the health risks of dying from COVID-1 9 … These results are nothing short of stunning. Mortality data have shown from the very beginning that the COVID-1 9 virus age-discriminates, with demises overwhelmingly concentrated in people who are older and suffer comorbidities.

This is perhaps the only uncontroversial case of prove we have about this virus. Virtually all US fatalities have been among beings older than 55; and yet a great number of Americans are still convinced that the risk to those younger than 55 is almost the same as to those who are older.”

The Franklin Templeton-Gallup Economics of Recovery Study of Americans discovered there were delusions in the general population about the risks associated with infection. The analysts then separated the beliefs and equated those to the actual data. This is from the report: 4

On median, Americans believe that parties aged 55 and older account for time over half of total COVID-1 9 extinctions; the actual figure is 92%.

Americans believe that beings aged 44 and younger account for about 30% of total deaths; the actual figure is 2. 7 %.

Americans overestimate the health risks of death from COVID-1 9 for parties aged 24 and younger by a factor of 50; and they thoughts the risk for beings aged 65 and older is half of what it actually is( 40% vs 80% ).

When the data were broken down by age groups they found that most people under age 65 certainly had no concept of the actual number of deaths for their age group: 5

Age Percent worried about serious outcomes Percent of actual total extinctions

18 -2 4

59.1%

0.1%

25 -3 4

67.1%

0.7%

35 -4 4

69.3%

1.9%

45 -5 4

67.9%

5.0%

55 -6 4

69.8%

12.2%

65+

77.6%

80.0%

“The discrepancy with the actual mortality data is overwhelming: for parties aged 18-24, the share of those worried about him serious health ramifications is 400 times higher than the share of total COVID fatalities; for those age 25-34 it is 90 times higher.”

Writing in Wirepoints, 6 Mark Glennon commented on the findings saying, “The only good report there is that tribes 65 and older are becoming more aware of the deepened probability for their own age group.”7

The report8 determined two major criminals of the fundamental misunderstanding of basic facts from a COVID-1 9 illnes. Those perpetrators were misinformation primarily shared on social media and the adherent bias for Democrats to “mistakenly overstate the risk of death from COVID-1 9 for younger people.” Templeton’s chief investment officer Sonal Desai, Ph.D ., observation: 9

“This, unhappily, was no surprise. Fear and indignation are the most reliable operators of date; unnerving narratives of young victims of such pandemic, intimating that we are all at risk of dying, rapidly become viral; so do stories that condemn everything on your political adversaries.

Both social and traditional media have been churning out these two types of narratives in order to further more sounds and increase their audience.”

Recent Sign Advocates Nothing Has Changed

The data for the Templeton-Gallup study were gathered between July 2, 2020, and July 14, 2020, and were based on a sample size of 10,014 U.S. adults. 10 As disturbing as these misperceptions reported in the news and shared on social media may have been in the first six months of the pandemic, last-minute attest indicates not too much has changed.

February 10, 2021, CNN reported1 1 that 25% of the person or persons surveyed judged there was a small risk to returning to prepandemic levels of activity and 66% reported there was a large or moderate peril. The survey was taken between February 5, 2021, and February 8, 2021, and “based on a nationally representative sample of 1,030 people age 18 and older.”1 2

From this small sample, CNN found that the group least likely to view COVID-1 9 as increased risk were beings aged 18 to 29. However, the percentage of individuals in this age group was nearly equal to that is located within the Templeton-Gallup Study done seven months earlier. 13

In the Templeton-Gallup Study, 14 59.1% of 18-to-24-year olds were worried about serious side effects, while in the CNN poll, 15 58% of 18- to 29 -year-olds were worried about serious side effects. Yet, the percent of extinction in that age group is also nearly identical: 0.1% in July 202016 and 0.4% in August 2021.17

The partisan divide identified in the Templeton-Gallup Study can also be found in vaccination proportions all over the country. In other words, Democrat are most often than Republicans is completely injected. 18 This follows along with data found in the CNN poll, 19 which is demonstrated that 76% of the people who had been vaccinated continue to see COVID-1 9 as a high risk.

Based on the percentage of individuals who are vaccinated in the U.S ., there continues to be nearly a majority of Americans who are operating under the misconception that the infection has a broad effect on every age group. Harmonizing to Mayo Clinic’s COVID-1 9 tracker2 0 approximately 52.7% of adults in the U.S. have been completely inoculated on August 31, 2021.

The Washington Post2 1 reported August 2, 2021, that 70% of adults had received at least one shot. Extrapolating this information, if 76% of those who are injected believe that COVID is a broad-spectrum jeopardy for the population, this wants from 40% to 53.2% of the country continues to hold this belief.

From the small CNN2 2 test, it appears the percentage who are worried about serious side effects across a broad senility collection are no longer able have thrown significantly since the first six months of the pandemic, and 18 a few months later parties continue to operate under misconceptions.

Those Who Didn’t Take the Jab Think It Is the Greater Risk

Another published ballot by23 attended from July 15, 2021, to July 27, 2021, found that 67% of adults have received the COVID vaccine and 3% say they will get it as soon as they can. This number has remained relatively unchanged since a previous ballot in June 2021.24 Of those who responded, 10% want to “wait and see” how the inoculation performs and 14% say they will “definitely not” get a vaccine. This quantity has also remained relatively steady since December 2020.

A fourth poll2 5 found that injected mortals are nearly twice as likely to worry about the brand-new COVID variants over those who were unvaccinated. Additionally, the same poll shows that many of the unvaccinated adults guess the shot is a bigger risk than the illnes, which is opposite from the 88% of vaccinated adults that conclude the illnes is a larger risk than the inoculation.

The majority of unvaccinated adults argued that the news media have “generally exaggerated” the seriousness of the pandemic, which is likely the result of publishing broad data without accurately represents the number of individuals who are seriously ill or who have died.

President Biden is quoted in The Washington Post2 6 reiterating the same data from health experts in the U.S. Biden said: 27 “If you’re unvaccinated, you are much more likely to, one, get COVID-1 9; two, come hospitalized; and, three, die if you get it. This is a tragedy.”

However, this is opposite of data from other reporting countries such as Israel and Scotland, where half or more of those hospitalized in August and September 2021 were vaccinated. 28,29, 30,31

When misinformation is being spread from the top down, it’s easy to understand how Americans continue to believe the illnes is killing equal numerals in each age group. While any death from this infection is one death too many, so is any death from coronary thrombosis, lung cancer, car accidents and drownings.

Yet, people have not stopped dining poorly, smoking, driving gondolas and swimming. Nor has the government mandated these activities stop.

If the Pandemic Is so Bad, Why Censor Social Media?

The debate over social media censorship is raging. 32,33, 34 At no time in history could you imagine that beings would support censoring ideas in a country built on freedom of speech. 35 Your titles to free speech and “peaceably to make, and to petition the Government for a redress of grudges, ”3 6 are your First Amendment liberties. And hitherto, some news media and belief writers has all along been directories of utopian-like advantages to censorship that include: 37,38, 39

Reducing conflict and avoiding panic in emergencies

Adding beds of security to internet pulpits

Stopping comprehended “false” content and influencing public opinion

Keeping its population under control

Protecting social media consumers

The issue with these alleged advantages is that someone must be responsible for determining what is advisable to censored, what is false information and in what counseling public opinion should be influenced — not to mention how to decide what events would authorize “controlling” the population, and what the control measures might be. In other commands, censorship ensures that the opinion of a few will influence the majority. And that’s what has happened in the past 18 months.

As has been demonstrated, numerous Americans are unaware of the real numbers behind the COVID-1 9 pandemic. And more, it appears that the only parties being censored in social media are those who oppose the vaccine, who want to ensure proper treatment for those infected and who share their physical health challenges after participate in the genetic care injection.

In other utterances, Americans are still uneducated by the news media or information announced in social media about the number of people who died from the COVID-1 9 infectious diseases and about proper medication. The knowledge being censored, and called incorrect content, has enabled the government to reduce conflict by reducing debate over vaccines, cover-ups and therapy etiquettes, as well as helped save local populations under control.

These are the very same so-called “advantages” registered for censorship which have enabled us to operate your behaviour and affect your thoughts. Ironically, one of the contentions against censorship is that: 40

“It abbreviates the overall intelligence of the general public. Censorship requires that the general population be under tight restricts so that specific outcomes are achievable every time. It is an attempt to prevent types from discovering what the truth of any place happens to be.

Even an aim at suggesting that content is forgery or untrustworthy … is a way to create censorship from an official capacity.”

Unfortunately, it’s clear that much of the population doesn’t realize what their acceptance of censoring is doing to them. It’s not just about losing your freedom of speech and right to think freely; admitting censorship at the levels you’re now accompanying too fortifies your compliance while it quells your access to truths — truths that could save your life.

Blinded From Science or Lies?

As was written in the report from the Franklin Templeton-Gallup Study, the American public has been “blinded from science, ” and more often than not, it has been done through lies. In point, some of the incompatible statements made by health experts are outlook in the same affirmations or interviews.

For example, in an interview with MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci, conductor of the National Institute of Allergy and Contagious diseases and director medical consultant to the president of the U.S ., exhibited his unique firebrand of apologizing behaviour as he has spoken about the virus and the shot program, saying: 41

“The delta variant is the totally reigning discrepancy now in this country. More than 80 or 85%, and in some areas 95%, but even more importantly it is clear now that when there are breakthrough infections, namely people who are injected but still get infected with the delta discrepancy, which happens because no inoculation is 100% effective.

We’ve learned clearly now, without a doubt, that people who are inoculated get a breakthrough infection, actually have enough virus in their nasopharynx, that they can actually transmit it to other people and have substantiated transmission to other people.”

From now he admonishes all people who have been inoculated to wear a mask indoors to prevent the spread of the illnes. His explanation is that the Delta variant has “changed the part landscape.” However, as we know from other viruses, the coronavirus will continue to mutate and alteration, which necessitates, from Fauci’s explanation, beings has all along been wearing masks to prevent the spread of a incessantly mutating virus.

The interviewer points out that as the virus continues to change, it means we won’t be able to “turn the page on coronavirus, because there might be new variants … “4 2 to which Fauci reacts, “It doesn’t have to be if the overwhelming majority of the people in this country get vaccinated. We could nail this down by simply crushing it.”4 3

So, within the space of four minutes Fauci said that without a doubt, people can get infected after vaccination and carry enough virus to give the infection — BUT — if the overwhelming majority of people are injected the virus would be crushed.

This highlights the need to seek out verifiable news reports and independent investigate indicate. Nonetheless, it isn’t enough to know it yourself. In this period in biography, it is everyone’s responsibility to share the truth in a nonadversarial mode that helps to educate your family, friends and neighbours without alienating them.